IS
CASTRATION ALLOWED IN THE BIBLE?
Castration, or the cutting off the male genitalia,
in total or partial manner in order to stop normal sexual function, for
whatever purpose, it is strictly forbidden in the Bible.
1 - One of the intentions of God by creating
humanity, was reproduction of humans until the world became full of them:
“Be fruitful and increase in number;
fill the earth and subdue it.”
Genesis 1:28.
2 – God forbade castration of men in Israel:
“No one who has been emasculated by
crushing or cutting may enter the assembly of YHWH”
Deuteronomy 23:1
Note that in this verse, the existence of castrated
people is acknowledged, but it is not approved, since all Israel was supposed
to participate of the Temple worship and sacrifice.
3 – God forbade the castration of animals:
“You must not offer YHWH an animal whose
testicles are bruised, crushed, torn or cut. You must not do this in your own
land”
Leviticus 22:24
“Neither you nor a foreigner shall
present food to your God from any such animal. They will not be accepted on
your behalf, because they are deformed and flawed.”
Leviticus 22:25
Some have argued here that these prohibitions refer
only to the animals for sacrifice but that it does not forbid total castration
of beasts altogether. However, in verse 25, God shows his rejection of such a
mutilation, which also contravenes his vision of the animal kingdom’s
reproductive purpose at the time of creation.
(Genesis 1:20-25)
WHAT ABOUT THE MENTION OF EUNUCHS IN THE
OLD TESTAMENT?
The first mention of the term ‘Eunuch’ or “Saris” סָרִ֖יס,
in the Bible is in 1Samuel 8:15; and
then in 1Kings 22:9.
In the case
of Samuel, is only part of a prophecy, when GOD YHWH tries to discourage the
united Israel of having a monarchy, warning them of the dangers it will bring
upon the nation. It is a future event.
In the second
passage however, they existed in the separate kingdom of Israel, along with
other errors, but not in the faithful Judea.
The first
mention of ‘Saris’ in the southern kingdom of Judah shows in the times of
Jehoiachin (2Kings 24:12) to be mentioned later several times by Jeremiah
(Jeremiah 29:2; 34:19; 38:7).
Some scholars
have argued that “Eunuch” became a generic name for Court official, not
necessarily implying that they were emasculated, however this is more unlikely
since ‘eunuchs’ were closely related to Harems of wives, slavery, and royalty
service, where we have knowledge, these people were emasculated (2Kings 20:18);
nevertheless, the case of Joseph in Egypt testifies that not every case was
like that (Genesis 41:45).
CONCLUSION
Deliberate
mutilation, including emasculation is contrary to the purpose of God for
creation, whether of humans or animals.
The
prohibition and lack of regulation, testifies of the non-existence in Israel of
this practice, until it became adopted by pagan influence of nations around
them, like the Egyptians, Babylonians or Greeks, but it was never approved by
God.
To deprive a
creature of his natural ability to reproduce, it is an attack on God’s
sovereignty, who created all humans and most animals with the intention of
reproduce, otherwise He will not have given them that capability from birth;
and it is therefore, sinful.
However, in
Christ Jesus, all people who have suffered this sinful mutilation are received
to salvation, through Faith in Jesus the Saviour (Acts 8:27).
Omar Flores.
Comments
Post a Comment